Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE vs RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L Comparison
Car Information
2.8
/
Engine / Motor
/
260 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
4
4 Seater
2390
/
5054.6
4700 mm
2070.1
1840 mm
1447.8
1395 mm
2951.48
2730 mm
/
2 Doors
/
300 L
/
135 m
Fuel Economy
12.3
7 Km/L
/
66 L
/
7 Km/L
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
AMG SPEEDSHIFT® MCT 9-speed
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/40R20
/
295/35R20
/
Key Spec
4.0 L
/
462 BHP - 585 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
2 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
V
V
4.0L
3.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
Handcrafted AMG 4.0L V8 biturbo w/rear 150kW permanently synchronous electric motor
/
biturbo
Single Turbo
831 hp
312 BHP
/
/
831 hp @ 5,500-6,500 rpm
/
1400
377 Nm
1400 Nm@ 2,500-4,500 rpm
/
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE
- Intelligent Emergency Call
RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE if you care more about fuel economy; choose RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a fuel consumption of 8.13, while RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a wheelbase of 2951.48, while RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L has a wheelbase of 2730 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE uses Four-Wheel Drive, while RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L uses All Wheel Drive.