Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE vs Supra 3.0T GR M/T Comparison
Car Information
2.8
/
Engine / Motor
/
250 km/h
/
6
/
2990 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
4
2 Seater
2390
/
5054.6
4379 mm
2070.1
1854 mm
1447.8
1292 mm
2951.48
2470 mm
/
2 Doors
/
52 L
Fuel Economy
12.3
13.9 Km/L
/
52 L
/
13.9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sports
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
8.8
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AMG SPEEDSHIFT® MCT 9-speed
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/40R20
/
295/35R20
/
Key Spec
4.0 L - 3982 L
3000 L - 3000 L
469 BHP - 576 BHP
382 - 382
Automatic
6-Manual Transmission & 8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & Manual
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater
2 - 2
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
4.0L
3.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
Handcrafted AMG 4.0L V8 biturbo w/rear 150kW permanently synchronous electric motor
/
biturbo
Single Turbo
831 hp
382 BHP
/
/
831 hp @ 5,500-6,500 rpm
/
1400
500 Nm
1400 Nm@ 2,500-4,500 rpm
/
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE
- Intelligent Emergency Call
Supra 3.0T GR M/T
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE if you care more about interior space; choose Supra 3.0T GR M/T if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a fuel consumption of 8.13, while Supra 3.0T GR M/T has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, Supra 3.0T GR M/T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE has a wheelbase of 2951.48, while Supra 3.0T GR M/T has a wheelbase of 2470 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Supra 3.0T GR M/T uses Rear Wheel Drive.