Mercedes-Benz C 63S Performance vs EQM5 T3 Edition Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
4 Seater
4 Seater
4 Doors
/
4755 mm
5040 mm
1839 mm
1910 mm
1426 mm
1569 mm
2840 mm
2990 mm
/
433 L
Fuel Economy
60 L
/
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
TBD
134 BHP
TBD
DHT
TBD
Electric
TBD
/
TBD
4 Seater - 5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Engine
Petrol
Electric
451 BHP
134 BHP
550 Nm
/
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-Benz C 63S Performance
EQM5 T3 Edition
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQM5 T3 Edition
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-Benz C 63S Performance if you care more about overall equipment; choose EQM5 T3 Edition if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-Benz C 63S Performance has a fuel consumption of No data, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-Benz C 63S Performance has a wheelbase of 2840 mm , while EQM5 T3 Edition has a wheelbase of 2990 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQM5 T3 Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-Benz C 63S Performance uses All Wheel Drive , while EQM5 T3 Edition uses Front Wheel Drive.