Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ vs K8 2.5L GDI Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250
/
8
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4993
5015 mm
1907
1875 mm
1460
1455 mm
2939
2895 mm
540
510 L
Fuel Economy
11.0
12 Km/L
66
64 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.0 L
1.6 L - 3.5 L
367 - 449
177 BHP - 300 BHP
9-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic
Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Hybrid & Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Engine
4.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
612 BHP
198 BHP
850
248 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+
K8 2.5L GDI
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and luxurious interior design
- Optimal performance and economical fuel consumption
- Security system and advanced technologies
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Slightly limited rear legroom
- Difficulty in the availability of some custom options
Related comparisons
Editor's PickK8 2.5L GDI
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space; choose K8 2.5L GDI if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while K8 2.5L GDI has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, K8 2.5L GDI is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2939, while K8 2.5L GDI has a wheelbase of 2895 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive, while K8 2.5L GDI uses Front Wheel Drive.