Mercedes-AMG G 63 vs BYD e2 Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
4.5
/
Engine / Motor
220
/
8
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
/
4.613
/
1.984
/
1.969
/
2.890
/
Fuel Economy
13.1
/
100
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
2.9 L - 4.0 L
TBD
330 - 585 BHP
TBD
2-speed automatic (for off-road low-range gear) & 9-speed automatic & 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic & Automatic
TBD
Diesel & Electric & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
4.0 L
/
Gasoline
/
585 BHP
/
850
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG G 63
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
BYD e2
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBYD e2
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG G 63 if you care more about overall equipment; choose BYD e2 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG G 63 has a fuel consumption of 7.63, while BYD e2 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG G 63 has a wheelbase of 2.890, while BYD e2 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG G 63 uses All Wheel Drive, while BYD e2 uses No data.