CarteaCompare CarsMercedes-AMG G 63 vs EcoSport 1.5 Trend

Mercedes-AMG G 63 vs EcoSport 1.5 Trend Comparison

Car Information

4.5

/

Engine / Motor

220

170 km/h

8

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4.613

3998 mm

1.984

1765 mm

1.969

1645 mm

2.890

2521 mm

/

346 L

Fuel Economy

13.1

16.4 Km/L

100

52 L

/

16.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.9 L - 4.0 L

1.5 L

330 - 585 BHP

120 BHP

2-speed automatic (for off-road low-range gear) & 9-speed automatic & 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic & Automatic

TBD

Diesel & Electric & Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

4.0 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

585 BHP

120 BHP

850

151 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mercedes-AMG G 63

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Rollover stability control
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Speed Limiter
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • EcoSport 1.5 Trend

    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEcoSport 1.5 Trend

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mercedes-AMG G 63 if you care more about power; choose EcoSport 1.5 Trend if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG G 63

VS

Aston Martin | Aston Martin DBX 2024 4.0T (707 Edition)

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG G 63

VS

Aston Martin | Aston Martin DBX 2023 4.0T (707 Edition)

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG G 63

VS

Bentley | Bentley Bentayga 2021 6.0L W12

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG G 63

VS

Bentley | Bentley Bentayga 2020 6.0L W12

Mercedes Benz | Mercedes-AMG G 63

VS

Bentley | Bentley Bentayga 2019 6.0L W12

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG G 63 has a fuel consumption of 7.63, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a fuel consumption of 6.1. Therefore, EcoSport 1.5 Trend is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG G 63 has a wheelbase of 2.890, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a wheelbase of 2521 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EcoSport 1.5 Trend, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG G 63 uses All Wheel Drive, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend uses Front Wheel Drive.