Mercedes-AMG G 63 vs HS5 Basic 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220
200 km/h
8
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4.613
4760 mm
1.984
1907 mm
1.969
1700 mm
2.890
2870 mm
/
4 Doors
/
453 L
/
130 m
Fuel Economy
13.1
7.1 Km/L
100
64 L
/
7.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.9 L - 4.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
330 - 585 BHP
221 BHP - 252 BHP
2-speed automatic (for off-road low-range gear) & 9-speed automatic & 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic & Automatic
8-speed integrated manual/automatic transmission & Automatic
Diesel & Electric & Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
585 BHP
221 BHP
850
340 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG G 63
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
HS5 Basic 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG G 63 if you care more about fuel economy; choose HS5 Basic 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG G 63 has a fuel consumption of 7.63, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG G 63 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG G 63 has a wheelbase of 2.890, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2870 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS5 Basic 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG G 63 uses All Wheel Drive, while HS5 Basic 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.