Mercedes-AMG G 63 vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220
/
8
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
4.613
4810
1.984
1925
1.969
1742
2.890
2800
/
19
Fuel Economy
13.1
13
100
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
Driver Seat
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
Driver Seat
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
15.6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
2.9 L - 4.0 L
-
330 - 585 BHP
254 - 254
2-speed automatic (for off-road low-range gear) & 9-speed automatic & 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic & Automatic
AT & Automatic
Diesel & Electric & Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.0 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
585 BHP
254
850
390
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG G 63
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Tiggo 9 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG G 63 if you care more about fuel economy; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG G 63 has a fuel consumption of 7.63, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG G 63 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG G 63 has a wheelbase of 2.890, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 9 Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG G 63 uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.