Mercedes-AMG G 63 vs Standard 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220
180
8
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4.613
4710
1.984
1930
1.969
1620
2.890
2875
/
2220
Fuel Economy
13.1
/
100
56
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
10.25
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Nappa Leather Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
Safety
✓
✓
✓
6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
12.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
11
Battery/Charging
/
30 Min
/
3.3 Hours
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
Double-Wishbone Front Independent Suspension With Four - Ball Joint
/
Multi-Link Trapezoidal Arm Rear Independent Suspension
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.9 L - 4.0 L
1.5T
330 - 585 BHP
435
2-speed automatic (for off-road low-range gear) & 9-speed automatic & 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic & Automatic
AT
Diesel & Electric & Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.0 L
1.5T
Gasoline
Hybrid
585 BHP
435
850
420
/
325
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
45 Min (30-80%)
/
4.5 Hrs ( 30-80% )
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate
/
R：PMSM
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG G 63
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Standard 2WD
- 360 Degree Camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- First Aid Kit
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG G 63 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Standard 2WD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG G 63 has a fuel consumption of 7.63, while Standard 2WD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG G 63 has a wheelbase of 2.890, while Standard 2WD has a wheelbase of 2875. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Standard 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG G 63 uses All Wheel Drive, while Standard 2WD uses Front Drive.