Mercedes-AMG G 63 vs Urus S 4.0T V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220
305 km/h
8
8
/
3996 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4.613
5123 mm
1.984
2022 mm
1.969
1638 mm
2.890
3003 mm
/
5 Doors
/
617 L
/
172 m
Fuel Economy
13.1
7 Km/L
100
75 L
/
7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
10.1
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.9 L - 4.0 L
4.0 L
330 - 585 BHP
650 BHP - 800 BHP
2-speed automatic (for off-road low-range gear) & 9-speed automatic & 9G-TRONIC 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Diesel & Electric & Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
585 BHP
666 BHP
850
850 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mercedes-AMG G 63
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Urus S 4.0T V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Outstanding sports performance with a powerful engine.
- Unique and eye catching exterior design.
- A luxurious interior with advanced technological equipment.
Negative
- The cost of purchase and maintenance is high.
- High fuel consumption and poor environmental considerations.
- Limited comfort while driving long distances.
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mercedes-AMG G 63 if you care more about fuel economy; choose Urus S 4.0T V8 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mercedes-AMG G 63 has a fuel consumption of 7.63, while Urus S 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, Mercedes-AMG G 63 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mercedes-AMG G 63 has a wheelbase of 2.890, while Urus S 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 3003 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Urus S 4.0T V8, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mercedes-AMG G 63 uses All Wheel Drive, while Urus S 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive.