GLB 200 vs EHS9 Executive Comparison

Car Information

9.1

/

/

160+245

/

≥500

/

99

Engine / Motor

207

200 km/h

4

/

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4.634

5209 mm

1.834

2010 mm

1,658

1713 mm

2.829

3110 mm

570

438 L

/

5 Doors

/

200 m

Fuel Economy

16.7

/

52

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Bucket

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

16.2

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

Transmission

/

7-speed dual-clutch automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

/

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.3 L - 2.0 L

/

163 BHP - 306 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

7-speed dual-clutch automatic & 8-speed automatic & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 7 Seater

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km - 515 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.3 L

/

Petrol

Electric

1.3 L turbocharged

/

163 BHP

429 BHP

120

/

250

300+450

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

8

/

options.Lithium-Ion

/

160+245 kW

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • GLB 200

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Spare Wheel
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • EHS9 Executive

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGLB 200

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose GLB 200 if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Executive if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | GLB 200

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee L 3.6L Limited+

Mercedes Benz | GLB 200

VS

Audi | Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design

Mercedes Benz | GLB 200

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2020 4.0L GXR GT

Mercedes Benz | GLB 200

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2019 4.0L GXR GT

Mercedes Benz | GLB 200

VS

Mercedes Benz | GLA 250 4MATIC

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, GLB 200 has a fuel consumption of 5.99, while EHS9 Executive has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, GLB 200 has a wheelbase of 2.829, while EHS9 Executive has a wheelbase of 3110 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Executive, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLB 200 uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Executive uses All Wheel Drive.