GLB 200 vs GLA 250 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
207
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4.634
4,410
1.834
1,834
1,658
1,611
2.829
2,729
570
/
/
1,600
Fuel Economy
16.7
6.6 L/100 km
52
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
7-speed dual-clutch automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
/
306 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
TBD
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.3 L
2.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
1.3 L turbocharged
/
163 BHP
224 hp
120
165
250
/
/
350 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
GLB 200
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Spare Wheel
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
GLA 250 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGLA 250 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GLB 200 if you care more about fuel economy; choose GLA 250 4MATIC if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GLB 200 has a fuel consumption of 5.99, while GLA 250 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 15.15. Therefore, GLB 200 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GLB 200 has a wheelbase of 2.829, while GLA 250 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,729. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GLA 250 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GLB 200 uses Front Wheel Drive, while GLA 250 4MATIC uses No data.