CarteaCompare CarsAMG GLB 35 4MATIC vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

AMG GLB 35 4MATIC vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison

Car Information

5.2

/

Engine / Motor

250

210 km/h

4

6

/

3490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

4.634

5115 mm

1.834

1980 mm

1,658

1920 mm

2.829

2890 mm

570

1004 L

/

5 Doors

/

221 m

Fuel Economy

13.2

9.4 Km/L

60

110 L

/

9.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

/

8-speed dual-clutch AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

/

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L

3.3 L - 5.7 L

306 BHP

240 BHP - 409

8-speed dual-clutch AT

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 7 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

V

2.0 L

4.0 L

Petrol

Gasoline

306 BHP

271 BHP

225

/

400

385 Nm

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • AMG GLB 35 4MATIC

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Spare Wheel
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose AMG GLB 35 4MATIC if you care more about fuel economy; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mercedes Benz | AMG GLB 35 4MATIC

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol LE T2 3.5L

Mercedes Benz | AMG GLB 35 4MATIC

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Navigator 2021 3.5L Reserve STD

Mercedes Benz | AMG GLB 35 4MATIC

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Nautilus 2024 2.7T V6 Presidential

Mercedes Benz | AMG GLB 35 4MATIC

VS

Lincoln | Nautilus PRESIDENTIAL

Mercedes Benz | AMG GLB 35 4MATIC

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol 2022 5.6L LE Titanium

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, AMG GLB 35 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 7.58, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, AMG GLB 35 4MATIC is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, AMG GLB 35 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2.829, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. AMG GLB 35 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.