CarteaCompare CarsMG One 1.5 LUX vs 300 Challenger 2.0T

MG One 1.5 LUX vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180 km/h

200 km/h

4

4

1490 cc

1998 cc

European

Chinese

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4581 mm

4760 mm

1871 mm

1930 mm

1617 mm

1927 mm

2670 mm

2750 mm

336 L

400 L

options. mm

224 m

Fuel Economy

13

10 Km/L

55 L

75 L

13 Km/L

10 Km/L

Comfort

Smart Entry

Keyless Entry

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Leather

Leather

Digital

Digital

Electric

Electric

/

Standard

Standard

/

/

/

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

Safety

/

Infotainment

Android LCD

Android LCD

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

9

Transmission

AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

2.0 L

181 BHP

223 BHP - 342 BHP

AT & CVT

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

LED

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

In-Line

1.5

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

Single Turbo

4

4

181 BHP

224 BHP

285 Nm

387 Nm

Technologies

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MG One 1.5 LUX

    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • 300 Challenger 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMG One 1.5 LUX

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MG One 1.5 LUX if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | MG One 1.5 LUX

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury

MG | MG One 1.5 LUX

VS

Peugeot | 2008 1.2T GT (155HP)

MG | MG One 1.5 LUX

VS

Nissan | XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

MG | MG One 1.5 LUX

VS

Jeep | Renegade Limited

MG | MG One 1.5 LUX

VS

Jeep | Renegade Trailhawk

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MG One 1.5 LUX has a fuel consumption of 7.69, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, MG One 1.5 LUX is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MG One 1.5 LUX has a wheelbase of 2670 mm , while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG One 1.5 LUX uses Front Wheel Drive , while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.