MG One 1.5 STD vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
190
4
4
1490 cc
/
European
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1515
/
5 Doors
/
4581 mm
4.275
1871 mm
1.765
1617 mm
1.535
2670 mm
2.570
336 L
240
Fuel Economy
13
15.4
55 L
48
13 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
Android LCD
/
✓
/
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
181 BHP
145 BHP - 148 BHP
AT & CVT
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
Single Turbo
/
4
/
181 BHP
148 BHP
285 Nm
192
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
N/A
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG One 1.5 STD
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG One 1.5 STD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG One 1.5 STD if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG One 1.5 STD has a fuel consumption of 7.69, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG One 1.5 STD has a wheelbase of 2670 mm , while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MG One 1.5 STD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG One 1.5 STD uses Front Wheel Drive , while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.