MG RX8 2024 2.0T Comfort (AWD) vs GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
9
/
/
SUVEngine / Motor
4
/
/
200 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
4.923
4980 mm
1.930
1950 mm
1.810
1780 mm
2.850
2920 mm
835
/
Fuel Economy
70
66 L
/
13.3 Km/L
/
13.3 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
2 L - 2 L
220 BHP
187 BHP - 332 BHP
Automatic
8-Speed Automatic & 8AT & AISIN 8AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
220 BHP
248 BHP
360
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG RX8 2024 2.0T Comfort (AWD)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG RX8 2024 2.0T Comfort (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG RX8 2024 2.0T Comfort (AWD) if you care more about price; choose GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG RX8 2024 2.0T Comfort (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG RX8 2024 2.0T Comfort (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.850, while GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2920 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG RX8 2024 2.0T Comfort (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while GS 8 2.0T GL (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.