MG RX8 2024 2.0T Comfort (AWD) vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison
Car Information
9
/
/
SUVEngine / Motor
4
/
/
180 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4.923
4545 mm
1.930
1856 mm
1.810
1668 mm
2.850
2680 mm
835
470 L
Fuel Economy
70
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
220 BHP
165 BHP - 248
Automatic
8AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Gasoline
220 BHP
165 BHP
360
265 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG RX8 2024 2.0T Comfort (AWD)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
GS4 1.5T GB
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS4 1.5T GB
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG RX8 2024 2.0T Comfort (AWD) if you care more about power; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG RX8 2024 2.0T Comfort (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG RX8 2024 2.0T Comfort (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.850, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS4 1.5T GB, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG RX8 2024 2.0T Comfort (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.