CarteaCompare CarsMG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD) vs 300 Challenger 2.0T

MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD) vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

9

/

Engine / Motor

4

4

/

200 km/h

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

4923

4760 mm

1930

1930 mm

1810

1927 mm

2850

2750 mm

/

5 Doors

/

400 L

/

224 m

Fuel Economy

/

10 Km/L

/

75 L

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L

2.0 L

220 BHP

223 BHP - 342 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

220 BHP

224 BHP

360

387 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Temperature Display
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • First Aid Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Auto Door Lock
  • 300 Challenger 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD) if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD)

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2023 1.6T-GDI Comfort

MG | MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD)

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.6T-GDI Flagship

MG | MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD)

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.6T-GDI Flagship

MG | MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD)

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2024 1.6T-GDI Comfort

MG | MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD)

VS

Haval | H6 2.0T Supreme (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2850, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD) , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD) uses All Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.