MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD) vs G318 Standard Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
4923
5010
1930
1985
1810
1895
2850
2880
Fuel Economy
/
16.3
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
2.0 L
1.5
220 BHP
252 BHP
Automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
220 BHP
252 BHP
360
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Temperature Display
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
G318 Standard
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD) if you care more about price; choose G318 Standard if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while G318 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.13. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2850, while G318 Standard has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G318 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG RX8 2024 2.0T STD (2WD) uses All Wheel Drive, while G318 Standard uses No data.