MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort vs Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

4

/

190 km/h

/

3490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4702

5004 mm

1903

1978 mm

1691

1802 mm

2765

2900 mm

382

470 L

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

55

74 L

/

9.4 Km/L

/

9.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L

2.5 L - 3.5 L

228 BHP - 231 BHP

250 BHP - 271 BHP

8-Speed Automatic & Automatic

9AT & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

3.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

228 BHP

271 BHP

370

340 Nm

/

In-Line

/

None

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort if you care more about price; choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury

MG | MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort

VS

Peugeot | 2008 1.2T GT (155HP)

MG | MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort

VS

Nissan | XTrail S 2WD (5-Seater)

MG | MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort

VS

Jeep | Renegade Limited

MG | MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort

VS

Jeep | Renegade Trailhawk

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2765, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG Whale 2024 2.0T Comfort uses All Wheel Drive, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.