MG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX vs Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
210
3
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4314
4549
1809
1860
1624
1689
2585
2734
448
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
14.9
48
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L
112 BHP - 168
216 BHP - 217 BHP
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.3 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
160 BHP
216 BHP
230
325
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickLynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX if you care more about fuel economy; choose Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, MG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX has a wheelbase of 2585, while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper has a wheelbase of 2734. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG ZS 2024 1.3T LUX uses Front Wheel Drive, while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive.