MG ZS 2024 1.5L LUX vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
190
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4314
4.275
1809
1.765
1624
1.535
2585
2.570
448
240
Fuel Economy
17.2
15.4
48
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L - 2000 L
112 BHP - 168
147 BHP - 148 BHP
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
112 BHP
148 BHP
150
192
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Motor
/
N/A
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG ZS 2024 1.5L LUX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG ZS 2024 1.5L LUX if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG ZS 2024 1.5L LUX has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, MG ZS 2024 1.5L LUX is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG ZS 2024 1.5L LUX has a wheelbase of 2585, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MG ZS 2024 1.5L LUX, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG ZS 2024 1.5L LUX uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.