MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD vs C5 TECH 1.5L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
180 km/h
4
4
/
1496 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4314
4400 mm
1809
1830 mm
1624
1590 mm
2585
2630 mm
448
/
/
5
Fuel Economy
17.2
7.1
48
51 L
/
6.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
112 BHP - 168
156 - 197
6AT & Automatic & CVT
7 Speed DCT & 7DCT & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
112 BHP
194 BHP
150
290
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
C5 TECH 1.5L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG ZS 2024 1.5L STD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD if you care more about price; choose C5 TECH 1.5L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585, while C5 TECH 1.5L has a wheelbase of 2630 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, C5 TECH 1.5L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive, while C5 TECH 1.5L uses Front Wheel Drive.