CarteaCompare CarsMG ZS 2024 1.5L STD vs Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS

MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD vs Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS Comparison

Car Information

10.9

/

Engine / Motor

170

180

4

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4314

4655

1809

1835

1624

1760

2585

2750

448

/

Fuel Economy

17.2

10.2

48

52

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

1.3 L - 1.5 L

1.5 L - 3.0 L

112 BHP - 168

144 BHP - 264 BHP

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

112 BHP

149 BHP

150

255

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS

    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • First Aid Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Positive

  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Comfortable and spacious interior space
  • Competitive price for specifications

Negative

  • Average engine performance
  • The quality of interior materials need to improve
  • A feature limited entertainment system

Related comparisons

Editor's PickChevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2020 1.8L Classic

MG | MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2021 1.8L Classic

MG | MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2018 1.8L Standard (Full Option)

MG | MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD

VS

Renault | Renault Captur 2018 1.2L SE

MG | MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Vitara 2020 1.6L GLX 2WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS has a fuel consumption of 9.8. Therefore, MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585, while Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS has a wheelbase of 2750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Chevrolet Captiva 2023 1.5T LS uses Front Wheel Drive.