CarteaCompare CarsMG ZS 2024 1.5L STD vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison

Car Information

10.9

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

170

185

4

3

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4314

4.314

1809

1.809

1624

1.624

2585

2.585

448

448

Fuel Economy

17.2

17.2

48

48

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

CVT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

1.3 L - 1.5 L

1.3 L - 1.5 L

112 BHP - 168

112 BHP - 168

6AT & Automatic & CVT

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

1.3 L

Gasoline

Petrol

112 BHP

160 BHP

150

230

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMG ZS 2024 1.5L STD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD if you care more about price; choose MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2020 1.8L Classic

MG | MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2021 1.8L Classic

MG | MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2018 1.8L Standard (Full Option)

MG | MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD

VS

Renault | Renault Captur 2018 1.2L SE

MG | MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Vitara 2020 1.6L GLX 2WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST uses Front Wheel Drive.