MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD vs TXL Comfort 1.6T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
200 km/h
4
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4314
4780 mm
1809
1885 mm
1624
1730 mm
2585
2800 mm
448
450 L
/
5 Doors
/
200 m
Fuel Economy
17.2
16 Km/L
48
50 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
112 BHP - 168
197 BHP - 261 BHP
6AT & Automatic & CVT
8AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
112 BHP
290 BHP
150
400 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
TXL Comfort 1.6T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD if you care more about price; choose TXL Comfort 1.6T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while TXL Comfort 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585, while TXL Comfort 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, TXL Comfort 1.6T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive, while TXL Comfort 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.