MG3 1.5 COM vs MG3 1.5 COM Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
16
16
4113
4113
1797
1797
1502
1502
2570
2570
Fuel Economy
17.8
17.8
45
45
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
7
7
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
4
4
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
10.25
10.25
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
4
4
Transmission
CVT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
McPherson
McPherson
Torison beam
Torison beam
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
195/55 R16
195/55 R16
195/55 R16
195/55 R16
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.5 L
109 BHP
109 BHP
CVT
CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
كهربائي
كهربائي
✓
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
109 BHP
109 BHP
140
140
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG3 1.5 COM
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
MG3 1.5 COM
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG3 1.5 COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG3 1.5 COM if you care more about price; choose MG3 1.5 COM if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG3 1.5 COM has a fuel consumption of 5.62, while MG3 1.5 COM has a fuel consumption of 5.62. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG3 1.5 COM has a wheelbase of 2570, while MG3 1.5 COM has a wheelbase of 2570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG3 1.5 COM uses Front Drive, while MG3 1.5 COM uses Front Drive.