CarteaCompare CarsMG4 64KWh Luxury vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L

MG4 64KWh Luxury vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L Comparison

Car Information

7.6

/

450

/

64

/

Engine / Motor

160

180 km/h

/

6

/

2698 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

18

/

/

4 Doors

/

4800 mm

/

1937 mm

/

1962 mm

/

2950 mm

/

562 L

/

260 m

Fuel Economy

/

9.2 Km/L

/

79 L

/

9.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.25

12

6

7

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Battery/Charging

140

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Mc. Suspension, Front Mount EPS

/

5 link rear suspension

/

/

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

167 BHP - 245

181 - 418 BHP

Automatic

8-speed Automatic & Automatic

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

-

/

5 - 5

4 - 5

/

2.3 L - 3.0 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

Electric

Gasoline

245

330 BHP

/

V

/

2.7 L

/

4

/

542 Nm

Motor

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MG4 64KWh Luxury

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Bronco Badlands 2.7L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Attractive and iconic design
  • Excellent off-road capabilities
  • Multiple engine options

Negative

  • High price for top categories
  • Limited internal storage space
  • Significant fuel consumption

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMG4 64KWh Luxury

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MG4 64KWh Luxury if you care more about price; choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | MG4 64KWh Luxury

VS

Exeed | VX Flagship 2.0T

MG | MG4 64KWh Luxury

VS

Exeed | Exeed VX 2023 2.0T-GDI Flagship

MG | MG4 64KWh Luxury

VS

Exeed | Exeed VX 2024 2.0T-GDI Flagship

MG | MG4 64KWh Luxury

VS

Peugeot | 3008 1.6T GT

MG | MG4 64KWh Luxury

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo 4x2

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MG4 64KWh Luxury has a fuel consumption of No data, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MG4 64KWh Luxury has a wheelbase of No data, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG4 64KWh Luxury uses No data, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive.