MG4 64KWh Luxury vs Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats Comparison

Car Information

7.6

8.5

450

/

64

/

/

185

Engine / Motor

160

/

Dimensions

5

6

18

235/55/R20

/

1985

/

4995

/

1960

/

1760

/

2920

Fuel Economy

/

14.9

Comfort

Front door keyless entry

/

/

/

/

Manual

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

12.3

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Leather+Imitation leather

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Forward collision warning system(FCW)

Blind spot monitoring system(BSD)

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.25

12.6

6

10

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

140

/

Transmission

Automatic

8AT

Chassis & Steering

Mc. Suspension, Front Mount EPS

McPherson independent suspension

5 link rear suspension

Multi-link independent suspension

/

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Electrical park brake (EPB)

Key Spec

TBD

/

168 BHP - 245

252 - 337 BHP

Automatic

8AT & Automatic

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

400Km

/

5 - 5

5 Seater - 7

/

3.0 L - 3.0 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Gasoline

245

252

/

2.0T

/

TGDI

/

380

Motor

/

Technologies

/

/

Eco, Comfort, Sport

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MG4 64KWh Luxury

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Electric Curtain - Rear
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMG4 64KWh Luxury

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MG4 64KWh Luxury if you care more about price; choose Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | MG4 64KWh Luxury

VS

Honda | Honda Pilot 2019 3.5L EX (AWD)

MG | MG4 64KWh Luxury

VS

Honda | Honda Pilot 2023 3.5L EX (AWD)

MG | MG4 64KWh Luxury

VS

Honda | Honda Pilot 2022 3.5L EX (AWD)

MG | MG4 64KWh Luxury

VS

Tank | 300 Challenger

MG | MG4 64KWh Luxury

VS

Tank | Tank 300 Challenger

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MG4 64KWh Luxury has a fuel consumption of No data, while Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MG4 64KWh Luxury has a wheelbase of No data, while Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats has a wheelbase of 2920. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG4 64KWh Luxury uses No data, while Hongqi HS7 2.0T Comfortable 2WD 6 Seats uses Front Drive.