MG4 77KWh Luxury vs 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
/
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
/
1930 mm
/
1927 mm
/
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
/
15 Km/L
/
75 L
/
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
12.3
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Battery/Charging
140
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Mc. Suspension, Front Mount EPS
/
5 link rear suspension
/
/
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
167 BHP - 245
342 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Electric
Hybrid
-
/
5 - 5
5 Seater
/
2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Hybrid
245
342 BHP
/
In-Line
/
2.0 L
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
648 Nm
Motor
✓
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MG4 77KWh Luxury
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
300 Challenger 2.0T HEV
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MG4 77KWh Luxury if you care more about overall equipment; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MG4 77KWh Luxury has a fuel consumption of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MG4 77KWh Luxury has a wheelbase of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MG4 77KWh Luxury uses No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV uses Four Wheel Drive.