MHERO II vs 11 AWD Comparison

Car Information

5.2

/

Hybrid

/

199000

/

MHERO

/

MHERO II

/

1.5

/

1300

/

31.7

/

Engine / Motor

/

200 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

3005

/

5

5 Doors

5100

4880 mm

1998

1970 mm

1899

1601 mm

2909

2975 mm

/

545 L

Fuel Economy

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

10.25

/

/

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Vinyl Upholstery

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Sports

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

10.25

/

/

/

/

Standard LCD

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

/

15 min (20%-80%)

/

Transmission

AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

intelligent all-wheel drive

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5

/

Hybrid

Electric

677

599 BHP

848

650 Nm

Key Spec

/

TBD

/

570 BHP

/

TBD

/

Electric

/

TBD

/

5 Seater

Motor

/

13.5

/

options.Lithium

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MHERO II

    • Electric Locks
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Heater
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • 11 AWD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick11 AWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MHERO II if you care more about power; choose 11 AWD if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MHERO II has a fuel consumption of No data, while 11 AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MHERO II has a wheelbase of 2909, while 11 AWD has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 11 AWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MHERO II uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 11 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.