MHERO II vs Telluride 3.8L V6 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
220 km/h
/
6
/
3778 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
3005
/
5
5 Doors
5100
500 mm
1998
1990 mm
1899
1750 mm
2909
2900 mm
/
594 L
/
203 m
Fuel Economy
/
8 Km/L
/
71 L
/
8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front & Back Row Seats
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Battery/Charging
/
/
15 min (20%-80%)
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
intelligent all-wheel drive
/
Key Spec
1.5
3.8 L - 3.8 L
677
291 - 291
AT
8 Speed AT & Automatic
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
7 - 8
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
3.8 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
677
291 BHP
848
355 Nm
/
V
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MHERO II
- Electric Locks
- 360 Degree Camera
- Heater
- Tire Repair Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Telluride 3.8L V6
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MHERO II if you care more about interior space; choose Telluride 3.8L V6 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MHERO II has a fuel consumption of No data, while Telluride 3.8L V6 has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MHERO II has a wheelbase of 2909, while Telluride 3.8L V6 has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MHERO II, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MHERO II uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Telluride 3.8L V6 uses All Wheel Drive.