MHERO II vs Tiggo 4 Pro COM Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
3005
/
5
5
5100
4318
1998
1831
1899
1662
2909
2610
/
Flush Door
/
17
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front & Back Row Seats
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Battery/Charging
/
/
15 min (20%-80%)
/
Transmission
AT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Drive
intelligent all-wheel drive
/
Wheels/brakes
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Key Spec
1.5
1.5 L - 1.5 L
677
111 BHP - 156
AT
Automatic & CVT
Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
677
111 BHP
848
/
/
1.5L
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MHERO II
- Electric Locks
- 360 Degree Camera
- Heater
- Tire Repair Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Tiggo 4 Pro COM
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 4 Pro COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MHERO II if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 4 Pro COM if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MHERO II has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MHERO II has a wheelbase of 2909, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a wheelbase of 2610. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MHERO II, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MHERO II uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM uses Front Drive.