MHERO II vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison

Car Information

5.2

/

Hybrid

/

199000

/

MHERO

/

MHERO II

/

1.5

/

1300

/

31.7

/

Dimensions

5

5

3005

/

5

5

5100

4500

1998

1842

1899

1746

2909

2670

/

Flush Door

/

18

Fuel Economy

/

16.6

Comfort

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Manual

Interior

✓

/

✓

/

Front & Back Row Seats

Driver Seat

10.25

12.3

✓

/

Front Row Seats

Driver Seat

Front Row Seats

Driver Seat

✓

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

Driver Seat

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

Driver Seat

/

✓

/

✓

/

Dual

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Safety

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

6

Battery/Charging

/

/

15 min (20%-80%)

/

Transmission

AT

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

Front Drive

intelligent all-wheel drive

/

Key Spec

1.5

1.5 L - 1.6 L

677

154 - 197 BHP

AT

6DCT AT & 7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission (DCT) & 7DCT

Hybrid

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5

5

Exterior

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

/

Electric

/

✓

Engine

1.5

1.6 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

677

197 BHP

848

290

/

1.6L TDGI

Technologies

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MHERO II

    • Electric Locks
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Heater
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Tiggo7 Pro Max COM

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTiggo7 Pro Max COM

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MHERO II if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

MHERO | MHERO II

VS

Honda | Pilot 3.5L Sport

MHERO | MHERO II

VS

Honda | Honda Pilot 2024 3.5 Sport (AWD)

MHERO | MHERO II

VS

Exeed | ET REEV Ultra

MHERO | MHERO II

VS

Toyota | Prado TXR 2.4T

MHERO | MHERO II

VS

Nissan | Patrol Safari Super Safari A/T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MHERO II has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MHERO II has a wheelbase of 2909, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MHERO II, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MHERO II uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.