Mitsubishi ASX GLX (2WD) Mid Option 2.0L vs Kicks SL Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
193 km/h
220 km/h
/
4
/
1997 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4355 mm
4365 mm
1810 mm
1800 mm
1625 mm
1620 mm
2670 mm
2655 mm
358 L
470 L
/
186 mm
Fuel Economy
63 L
45 L
11 Km/L
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
150 - 150
118 BHP - 142 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
150
142 BHP
197
190 Nm
/
In-Line
/
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
None
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mitsubishi ASX GLX (2WD) Mid Option 2.0L
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Kicks SL
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive and striking exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Reliable and consistent performance
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- The infotainment system is outdated
- Limited engine choices
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mitsubishi ASX GLX (2WD) Mid Option 2.0L if you care more about price; choose Kicks SL if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mitsubishi ASX GLX (2WD) Mid Option 2.0L has a fuel consumption of No data, while Kicks SL has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mitsubishi ASX GLX (2WD) Mid Option 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2670 mm , while Kicks SL has a wheelbase of 2655 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mitsubishi ASX GLX (2WD) Mid Option 2.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mitsubishi ASX GLX (2WD) Mid Option 2.0L uses Front Wheel Drive , while Kicks SL uses Front Wheel Drive .