Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GLX (4WD) vs Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 Comparison

Car Information

14.5

10.6

/

Engine / Motor

167

175

4

5

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5300

5.362

1785

1.976

1775

1.816

3000

3.221

/

1180

Fuel Economy

11.8

11.1

75

80

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Manual

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.4 L - 2351 L

2.0 L - 3198 L

128 BHP - 136 BHP

118 BHP - 392 BHP

Manual

10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual

Diesel & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

3 Seater - 5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.4 L

3.2 L

Gasoline

Diesel

128 BHP

200 BHP

202

470

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GLX (4WD)

    • Rear Defogger
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Cool Box
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickFord Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GLX (4WD) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 if you care more about overall equipment.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GLX (4WD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.01. Therefore, Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GLX (4WD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GLX (4WD) has a wheelbase of 3000, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a wheelbase of 3.221. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GLX (4WD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Double Cab GLX (4WD) uses All Wheel Drive, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 uses All Wheel Drive.