CarteaCompare CarsMitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) vs Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) vs Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 Comparison

Car Information

11.0

10.6

/

Engine / Motor

169

175

4

5

Dimensions

3 Seater

5 Seater

5300

5.362

1815

1.976

1780

1.816

3000

3.221

/

1180

Fuel Economy

10.0

11.1

75

80

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Manual

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.4 L - 2.5 L

2.0 L - 3.2 L

128 - 150

118 BHP - 392 BHP

5M/T & 6A/T & 6M/T & Manual

10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

2 - 6 Seater

3 Seater - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.4 L

3.2 L

Gasoline

Diesel

128 BHP

200 BHP

202

470

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD)

    • Rear Defogger
    • Steering Adjustment
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
  • Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Cool Box
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickFord Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) if you care more about interior space; choose Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 if you care more about fuel economy.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.01. Therefore, Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) has a wheelbase of 3000, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a wheelbase of 3.221. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 uses All Wheel Drive.