Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD) vs Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
169
175
4
5
Dimensions
6 Seater
5 Seater
5300
5.362
1815
1.976
1780
1.816
3000
3.221
/
1180
Fuel Economy
10.0
11.1
75
80
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L - 2351 L
2.0 L - 3198 L
128 BHP - 136 BHP
118 BHP - 392 BHP
Manual
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Diesel & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
3.2 L
Gasoline
Diesel
128 BHP
200 BHP
202
470
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD)
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickFord Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD) if you care more about interior space; choose Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.01. Therefore, Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD) has a wheelbase of 3000, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a wheelbase of 3.221. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GL (2WD) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 uses All Wheel Drive.