Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD) vs Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 Comparison

Car Information

14.5

10.6

/

Engine / Motor

167

175

4

5

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5205

5.362

1785

1.976

1775

1.816

3000

3.221

/

1180

Fuel Economy

11.8

11.1

75

80

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Manual

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.4 L - 2.5 L

2.0 L - 3.2 L

128 - 150

118 BHP - 392 BHP

5M/T & 6A/T & 6M/T & Manual

10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

2 - 6 Seater

3 Seater - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.4 L

3.2 L

Diesel

Diesel

136 BHP

200 BHP

324

470

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD)

    • Rear Defogger
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Cool Box
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD) if you care more about price; choose Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD)

VS

Ford | Ford Ranger 2024 2.2L Crew Cab (XLt) A/T (4X4)

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD)

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 2018 Express Regular Cab (Mid Option)

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD)

VS

Volkswagen | Amarok Comfortline 2.0T

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD)

VS

Toyota | Hilux Double Cab SGLX 4X4 2.7L

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD)

VS

Volkswagen | Amarok Life

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD) has a fuel consumption of 8.47, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.01. Therefore, Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD) has a wheelbase of 3000, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a wheelbase of 3.221. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Double Cab GLX Diesel (4WD) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 uses All Wheel Drive.