Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) vs Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 Comparison
Car Information
11.0
10.6
/
✓
Engine / Motor
169
175
4
5
Dimensions
3 Seater
5 Seater
5.300
5.362
1.815
1.976
1.780
1.816
3.000
3.221
/
1180
Fuel Economy
10.0
11.1
75
80
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Manual
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 2.5 L
2.0 L - 3.2 L
128 - 150
118 BHP - 392 BHP
5M/T & 6A/T & 6M/T & Manual
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 - 6 Seater
3 Seater - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
3.2 L
Petrol
Diesel
128 BHP
200 BHP
202
470
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD)
- Rear Defogger
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) if you care more about price; choose Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 10, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a fuel consumption of 9.01. Therefore, Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) has a wheelbase of 3.000, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 has a wheelbase of 3.221. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mitsubishi L200 2024 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Ford Ranger 2023 3.2L Wild Trak 4X4 uses All Wheel Drive.