Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX HL vs Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
167 km/h
190 km/h
1,193
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
880
/
5 Doors
/
3,795 mm
4220 mm
1,665 mm
1790 mm
1,510 mm
1399 mm
2,450 mm
2650 mm
235 L
320 L
160
/
Fuel Economy
35 L
50 L
21 Km/L
13.9 Km/L
/
13.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
2
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
4
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson strut
/
Torsion beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Ventilated discs
/
Leading and trailing drums
/
165/65R14
/
165/65R14
/
Key Spec
1.2 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
77 BHP - 79 BHP
127 BHP - 200 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.2T
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
78 BHP
147 BHP
100 Nm
179 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX HL
- Keyless Entry
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickVeloster 2.0L MPI Mid
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX HL if you care more about overall equipment; choose Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX HL has a fuel consumption of No data, while Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX HL has a wheelbase of 2,450 mm , while Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid has a wheelbase of 2650 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mitsubishi Mirage 1.2 GLX HL uses Front Wheel Drive , while Veloster 2.0L MPI Mid uses Front Wheel Drive.