Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid vs C4 Feel Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
200 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4385
4360 mm
1875
2032 mm
1850
1525 mm
2560
2670 mm
500
380 L
Fuel Economy
7.7
17.9 Km/L
69
50 L
/
17.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.8 L
1.2 L - 1.6 L
177 BHP - 250 BHP
155 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 9 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
184 BHP
155 BHP
303
240 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
C4 Feel
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC4 Feel
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid if you care more about power; choose C4 Feel if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid has a fuel consumption of 12.99, while C4 Feel has a fuel consumption of 5.59. Therefore, C4 Feel is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid has a wheelbase of 2560, while C4 Feel has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, C4 Feel, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid uses All Wheel Drive, while C4 Feel uses Front Wheel Drive.