Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid vs Highlander LE HEV 4X2 Comparison

Car Information

12.5

/

Engine / Motor

180

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4385

4950

1875

1930

1850

1730

2560

/

500

/

/

18

/

5

Fuel Economy

7.7

20.7

69

65

Comfort

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

7

/

/

Driver Seat

/

Fabric

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

Driver & Front Passenger + Knee + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

8

/

/

/

6

Transmission

/

Automatic

Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

235/65 R18

/

235/65 R18

Key Spec

3.0 L - 3.8 L

2.5 L - 2.5 L

177 BHP - 250 BHP

240 - 240

Automatic

CVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 9 Seater

7 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

184 BHP

240 BHP

303

/

/

91

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

ECO/NORMAL/SPORT

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Entry
    • Steering Adjustment
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • Highlander LE HEV 4X2

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHighlander LE HEV 4X2

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid if you care more about overall equipment; choose Highlander LE HEV 4X2 if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls Royce Cullinan 2023 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls Royce Cullinan 2024 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls-Royce Cullinan 2024 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid

VS

Rolls Royce | Rolls-Royce Cullinan 2022 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid

VS

Bentley | Bentley Bentayga 2020 6.0L W12 Speed

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid has a fuel consumption of 12.99, while Highlander LE HEV 4X2 has a fuel consumption of 4.83. Therefore, Highlander LE HEV 4X2 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid has a wheelbase of 2560, while Highlander LE HEV 4X2 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mitsubishi Pajero 2024 3.5L 3 Door mid uses All Wheel Drive, while Highlander LE HEV 4X2 uses Front Drive.