Mitsubishi Xpander 2024 1.5L HL vs Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
3
/
190
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4475
4.191
1750
1.794
1695
1.508
2775
2.601
/
405
Fuel Economy
45
50
/
22.7
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.0 L - 1.4 L
105 BHP
116 BHP - 150 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
105 BHP
116 BHP
141
200
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mitsubishi Xpander 2024 1.5L HL
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAudi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mitsubishi Xpander 2024 1.5L HL if you care more about interior space; choose Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mitsubishi Xpander 2024 1.5L HL has a fuel consumption of No data, while Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) has a fuel consumption of 4.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mitsubishi Xpander 2024 1.5L HL has a wheelbase of 2775, while Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) has a wheelbase of 2.601. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mitsubishi Xpander 2024 1.5L HL, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mitsubishi Xpander 2024 1.5L HL uses Front Wheel Drive, while Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.