MKX Lux vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
/
5 Doors
/
5115 mm
/
1980 mm
/
1920 mm
/
2890 mm
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
/
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.7
3.3 L - 5.7 L
309 BHP
240 BHP - 409
AT
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
7 - 8 Seater
Engine
3.7
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
309 BHP
271 BHP
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
385 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MKX Lux
Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMKX Lux
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MKX Lux if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MKX Lux has a fuel consumption of No data, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MKX Lux has a wheelbase of No data, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MKX Lux uses No data, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.