MKX Lux vs Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210
/
4
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
/
5075
/
1969
/
1716
/
2930
/
407
Fuel Economy
/
11.9
/
74
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
3.7
2.5 L - 3.7 L
309 BHP
226 BHP - 273 BHP
AT
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
7 Seater
Engine
3.7
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
309 BHP
226 BHP
/
420
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MKX Lux
Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MKX Lux if you care more about power; choose Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MKX Lux has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.4. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MKX Lux has a wheelbase of No data, while Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MKX Lux uses No data, while Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.