ML with Fabric Seat vs Omoda C7 Comfort Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

191km/h

/

Dimensions

5

5

4710mm

4660

1897mm

1875

1745mm

1670

/

1578

/

19"

/

2720

/

176

Fuel Economy

55L

51

/

13.3

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

15.6"

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

8.88"

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

7

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

6

8

/

Transmission

CVT

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

/

/

Macpherson Strut

/

Multilink

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated Disk

/

Ventilated Disk

/

Disk

/

235/50 R19

/

235/50 R19

Key Spec

2.4 L - 3.0 L

-

165 BHP - 236 BHP

195 HP - 341 HP

Automatic & CVT

7DCT & DHT

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 7

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5L

1.6

Gasoline

Gasoline

184

195 HP

245

290

Technologies

/

/

/

ECO / NORMAL / SPORT

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ML with Fabric Seat

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Child Lock
  • Omoda C7 Comfort

    • Power Tailgate
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Spare Wheel
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Integrated specifications
  • Competitive price value

Negative

  • Engine performance is moderate
  • Limited driving experience
  • Traditional interior design

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickML with Fabric Seat

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ML with Fabric Seat if you care more about price; choose Omoda C7 Comfort if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | ML with Fabric Seat

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Mitsubishi | ML with Fabric Seat

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Mitsubishi | ML with Fabric Seat

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Mitsubishi | ML with Fabric Seat

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Mitsubishi | ML with Fabric Seat

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ML with Fabric Seat has a fuel consumption of No data, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ML with Fabric Seat has a wheelbase of No data, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ML with Fabric Seat uses Front Drive, while Omoda C7 Comfort uses No data.