MU X 3.0T AWD LS vs BYD Ti7 Design Comparison

Car Information

/

5.3

/

80

/

26.6

Engine / Motor

/

190

Dimensions

7 Seater

5

4850 mm

5016

1870 mm

1995

1875 mm

1865

2855 mm

2920

235 L

1800L

/

2425

/

19"

/

5.7

/

190

/

24

/

25

Fuel Economy

80 L

60

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

All Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

PU

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

54

/

6.6

Transmission

/

AT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

AWD

/

Double wishbone type

/

Five-link

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated

/

Ventilated

/

60 /255 R19

/

60 /255 R19

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.0 L

/

136 BHP - 190 BHP

/

Automatic & Manual

/

Diesel & Petrol

/

TBD

/

7 - 7

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0 L

1.5T / PHEV

Diesel

Hybrid

190 BHP

480

450 Nm

630

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sport / Normal / Eco

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MU X 3.0T AWD LS

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
  • BYD Ti7 Design

    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
    • Remote Central Door Locking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickBYD Ti7 Design

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MU X 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about overall equipment; choose BYD Ti7 Design if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while BYD Ti7 Design has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while BYD Ti7 Design has a wheelbase of 2920. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BYD Ti7 Design, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while BYD Ti7 Design uses Four-Wheel Drive.