CarteaCompare CarsMU X 3.0T AWD LS vs C5 2025 Comfort

MU X 3.0T AWD LS vs C5 2025 Comfort Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

180 km/h

/

4

/

1496 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

7 Seater

5

4850 mm

4400

1870 mm

1830

1875 mm

1588

2855 mm

2630

235 L

360/1075

/

1381

/

5

Fuel Economy

80 L

51

/

11.2

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

10.25

/

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Safety

/

/

4

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

10.25

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

/

6

Transmission

/

CVT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

Macpherson

/

Torsion Beam

Wheels/brakes

/

/

215/60 R17

/

215/60 R17

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.0 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

136 BHP - 190 BHP

156 - 197

Automatic & Manual

7 Speed DCT & 7DCT & CVT

Diesel & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0 L

1.5 L

Diesel

Gasoline

190 BHP

156 BHP

450 Nm

230

/

In-Line

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

ECO, Sport

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MU X 3.0T AWD LS

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
  • C5 2025 Comfort

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMU X 3.0T AWD LS

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MU X 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about price; choose C5 2025 Comfort if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while C5 2025 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.93. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while C5 2025 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2630. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MU X 3.0T AWD LS, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while C5 2025 Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.