CarteaCompare CarsMU X 3.0T AWD LS vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship

MU X 3.0T AWD LS vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

4

Dimensions

7 Seater

7 Seater

4850 mm

4722

1870 mm

1860

1875 mm

1705

2855 mm

2710

235 L

/

Fuel Economy

80 L

/

/

14.9

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.0 L

1.5 L - 2.0 L

136 BHP - 190 BHP

197 HP - 310 BHP

Automatic & Manual

7 DCT & 7DCT & Automatic

Diesel & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0 L

2.0 L

Diesel

Gasoline

190 BHP

254 BHP

450 Nm

390

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MU X 3.0T AWD LS

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
  • Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Reflectors
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMU X 3.0T AWD LS

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MU X 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about price; choose Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship has a wheelbase of 2710. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MU X 3.0T AWD LS, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2024 2.0T Flagship uses All Wheel Drive.